Jane Doe’s autopsy was such a good horror movie it’s almost criminal that we didn’t get it The autopsy of Jane Doe 2 – a sequel to shed even more light on the mysterious Jane Doe.
Some of the best horror movies of all time stick with you long after you’ve left the theater – especially if they come with the crippling uncertainty of what you’ve just watched. At the same time, some of the most unsettling films in cinematic history are vastly underrated, even by horror fans themselves. Jane Doe’s autopsy is a movie that ticks both of those boxes.
Released in 2016, the film went unnoticed by moviegoers, amassing a measly $6 million at the box office. Even though the studio produced the film on a shoestring budget, it’s still a surprisingly small sum considering the usual popularity of horror movies. Still, critics loved it Jane Doe’s autopsyand there are more than a few reasons to do so.
To start, Jane Doe’s autopsy came out in the middle of the Insidious/Conjuration fury – a time when horror movies followed a very stereotypical pattern; a model that relied primarily on cheap jumpscares and startling sound cues to scare their audience. This movie, however, took a very different approach.
The film begins with an intriguing mystery. After an unidentified body – hence the “Jane Doe” – arrives at the morgue, a series of inexplicable, almost paranormal events begin to manifest. It soon becomes clear that this Jane Doe holds more secrets than can be counted, as she continues to haunt those who handle her bodily remains.
Low-budget horror films have become the cornerstone of the genre over the years. Since filmmakers are forced to do their best within their limits, the results often turn out to be incredibly scary – a quality that Jane Doe’s autopsy a shovel. The film is also loaded with enough subtle detail that it never feels cheap or messy, despite its modest means.
Perhaps the best part of the film is how well it manages to create a complex and fascinating mythos throughout its short duration. What most movies do in two hours – heck, the Conjuring the series even rivals the Marvel Cinematic Universe in terms of runtime – Jane Doe’s autopsy Done in less than an hour and a half. It hooks you and doesn’t let go until the end credits, and even then the ending leaves you with a lingering sense of dread.
Director André Øvredal cleverly introduced a short-lived sequel hook at the end of the film. In a move that goes along with the film’s premise of “everything gets stranger”, we are left with the lingering question of whether Jane Doe is really dead – not to mention the even more pressing question of what is even Jane Doe.
While other horror films with an equally rich background – like Robert Eggers’ The witch – have also done well without sequelae, Jane Doe’s autopsy is one of those movies that makes you want more. Not because the film fails in any particular area – but simply because you want to know what’s next for the creature Øvredal created.
In the current state of things, there was no question of a Jane Doe’s autopsy sequel, but fans of the movie would be delighted to hear that Øvredal has been busy in the horror movie industry. His next film, The Last Voyage of Demeterpromises to reintroduce Dracula to mainstream horror popularity – something no other horror director has done in quite a while.
Considering the film is based on one of the early chapters of Bram Stoker’s masterpiece – specifically the one that deals with a merchant ship unknowingly carrying the body of Count Dracula – The Last Voyage of Demeter might be the closest we can see to a real Jane Doe’s autopsy after.